In Washington, D.C., the saga of the Federal debt ceiling, resulting from ever growing budget deficits, continues. Unfortunately, the story that fiscal policy alone is not enough to solve this problem remains largely untold.
On March 16, 2006, freshman Senator Obama pointed out, “The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies.” And, as Democratic Senate leader Reid said just a short while before Obama spoke that same day, “President Thomas Jefferson said: I place economy among the first and most important government virtues, and public debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared.”
But that of course leaves out the monetary policy. Previously, I have pointed out that we cannot honestly address the debt problem unless we follow the 3 part solution offered by Warren T. Brookes in the 1986 Heritage Foundation symposium on cutting the budget:
returning to the gold standard (as Bill Clinton has pointed out, going off the gold standard has had a number of deleterious effects),
allowing for competing currencies, and
abolishing the Federal Reserve.
Congressman Paul Broun has introduced legislative proposals in the House that would address these issues by following most of the solutions proposed by Brookes.
An additional measure would be the passage of a modified version of Dr. Paul’s bill from 2011, H.R. 2768 -- the Debt Crisis Resolution Act, which would “cancel public debt held by the Federal Reserve System and ... lower the public debt limit by an equal amount.” I would modify the original bill to make sure that the second part of its stated purpose is carried out. My addition to the original bill would be a new section:
SEC. 3. LOWERING OF THE PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT
(a) Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the dollar limitation contained in such subsection; and inserting in lieu thereof an amount equal to the difference between the stricken out dollar limitation, and the amount equal to the amount of obligations described in Section 2(a) of this Act.
(b) The amendment made by Section 3(a) of this Act shall take effect immediately upon the execution of Section 2 of this Act.
Will America start prospering again — as it has not prospered for over a decade? Likely yes. But not without a fight. Now that Jim DeMint has raided Steve Moore from the Wall Street Journal that card might be Heritage Foundation vs. the White House. Could be big.
John Holdren, now Obama’s White House science advisor, 40 years ago termed America “overdeveloped.” Holdren co-authored a 1993 book, Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions, with Anne and Paul Ehrlich reportedly saying that, “A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States….” (Emphasis supplied.)
As a soldier of France, no one knew better than Professor Jacques Rueff, the famous French central banker, that World War I had brought to an end the preeminence of the classical European states system and its monetary regime, the classical gold standard. World War I had decimated the flower of European youth; it had destroyed the European continent’s industrial primacy. No less ominously, the historic monetary standard of commercial civilization had collapsed into the ruins occasioned by the Great War. The international gold standard -- the gyroscope of the Industrial Revolution, the common currency of the world trading system, the guarantor of more than one-hundred years of a stable monetary system, the balance wheel of unprecedented economic growth -- all this was brushed aside by the belligerents.
Publisher's Note: Originally released in June/July of 1991, this detailed report discusses Jacques Rueff's economic theories and applies them to modern economic events.
By John D. Mueller
Reply to Polyconomics - Part 1
Having demonstrated that the World Dollar Base “works,” and having explained in detail why it works, we turn finally to answering Wanniski and Goldman.
Wanniski delegates most of the Polyconomics’ attack on LBMC to David Goldman. Strange to say, it is necessary to answer Wanniski and Goldman separately. This is because their arguments against LBMC’s monetary approach are not only different, but mutually exclusive.
"Commercial banking grew out of the desire (inspired by the profit motive) to conserve cash (gold) and by means of credit to provide financial elasticity and growth in the commercial process of exchange. That is, all producers (sellers) who desired true money (gold), instead of the short-term secured credit bills – promissory notes of their customers (the buyers) – could, through the mediation of goldsmiths-turned-bankers and bill-merchants-turned-bankers, obtain real money by discounting their bills of exchange for gold with the emerging commercial bankers of early modern Europe. The combined institutions of stable money and secured credit enabled commercial civilization to make of the entire world the only closed economy."
Momentum for a Centennial Monetary Commission empirically to study the effects of various monetary regimes, including but not limited to the gold standard, continues to build.
On January 24, 2014, at its winter meeting, the Republican National Committee unanimously adopted a resolution urging:
"the relevant Subcommittee and Committee Chairmen in, and the...
For years, Castro’s Cuba has exported communism. The exports continue but the economic crows have come home to roost...even while Cuba’s economy floats only because of the generosity of Venezuelan oil exports.
Ironically, as Cuba has fallen apart, admirers of its economic mismanagement have kept the country from going bust. Keith...